Quote:
Originally Posted by kamuzrana
yeah i'm a bit skeptical i guess. i watched that doc "loose change" and that made me convinced the gov't planned it all. then i read, was it scientific american (?) that did the refutation of 9/11 myths?
and now i'm confused again. who knows? 
i won't say anythign is certain. |
Those who refute the 9/11 "myths" are usually insiders, who speak of things that the general public don't know about, or have no access to. There are the unreleased black boxes records and surveillance camera tapes that are constantly cited and used as evidence. "The official 9/11 report said so and so .." Why should the official report by experts be good enough an evidence? Who knows whether or not they're on it with the government? Of course they'll try to cover up. If there's a crime you want to cover up, you'll obviously hire hand-selected detectives to investigate, and you'll always make sure you hire those who will play along with your original plan.