View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008, 09:26 PM
Variable's Avatar
Variable
Super Moderator Offline
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Rating: 3 Votes / 3.67 Average
Posts: 8,661
Variable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Maglev Trains: The Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by IbnMardhiyah View Post
Can you clarify that please? As far as I'm aware, the TGV trains in France are pretty fast and can match the speed of Mag-Levs.

Regardless of whether capex or opex is higher, it just doesn't make sense to spend the energy to elevate the train because there is no commensurate ROI from what I can see.
Sorry I don't know what half of that means.

What I'm saying is, I don't think the actual levitation of the train is what is costing more, in fact I've heard (unsubstantiated) that it costs less to move a train that way than it does to move it along in conventional ways. What is always cited as the key factor is the capital cost of infrastructure.

When it comes to their speed, they can go pretty much as fast as you want them to, the limiting factor is air and EM resistance, and much more critically, safety and comfort around turns. It's that last part that is apparently keeping them at the current speeds.
__________________
What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.... not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women -- not merely peace in our time, but peace in all time.

JFK
Reply With Quote