View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008, 02:01 AM
GOTFIVEONIT's Avatar
GOTFIVEONIT
Banned Offline
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Rating: 13 Votes / 2.46 Average
Posts: 11,208
GOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond reputeGOTFIVEONIT has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Official Election 2008 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaminyu View Post
I can't say for sure if he would be better for Muslims, but saying he'd be less likely to be a warmonger isn't quite accurate:

Obama supports war with Iran (he sees the civil war in Iraq as actually a war with Iran)

Obama more of the same pro-war pro-israel BS

Obama votes with Israel on Lebanese invasion

Obama support for Israel

Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran and Pakistan (dead link):



And then there is his speech at AIPAC (which is too long to post here).

On the other hand, you have Ron Paul, who is a non-interventionist (i.e. doesn't believe in getting involved with foreign affairs at all), and wants to cut off all aid to Israel.

So who's less of a warmonger?
you forgot to mention that he has already threatend to bomb pakistan, and nuke pakistan and afghanistan to 'get bin laden'. its not always about arabs ya know.
Reply With Quote