Quote:
Originally Posted by GOTFIVEONIT
ron paul cant win. lets be sensible here. he couldnt even make more than 10% of the vote in the iowa primary. thank god you live in a blue state, your vote will be meaningless regardless of how you vote.
|
He was expected to be at 4% in Iowa, and 10% is only 3% points away from 3rd place. Iowa is a big Christian state anyway, so of course Huckabee is going to be 1st. The problem for Ron Paul in Iowa, was that he opposed Ethanol as an alternative fuel because the extract from the corn still requires coal and fossil fuels, and they simply didn't understand that.
Quote:
|
all politicians cater to the zionist lobby. you cant get elected if you dont. thats a fact. if you want to change that, its time Muslims start actually voting for these people who have a chance to win, that way we can go back to them and say 'see you won because of us'. and i know that mosssad here will agree with me on that. unless we can stop the zionist lobby in its track, its useless to take it out on the politicians. they are very clever, they will split the muslim vote if they have to over nationality. its why bill clinton went to bat over kosova, then showed up on pakistani tv claiming how he helped the muslims of kosova so much. besides let's not forget all the billions of dollars in aid countries like egypt and jordan receive. along with pakistan now too.
|
Well, Ron Paul doesn't cater to the Zionist lobby, and he's doing fairly well. The Zionist lobby, and their MSM underlings, have pretty much done all they can do now against him. Unfortunately for them, they don't have a monopoly on the flow of information, so that isn't going to be enough to stop him.
At this point, they only thing they can do is rig the votes, and if that fails, then they'd probably resort to assassination. But, at that point, it would be too late for them, as that wouldn't be enough to stop his revolution.
Quote:
|
if you really want to help Muslims, first find a way to get rid of the repugs. most democrats are opposed to the war, and any democrat who becomes president will have to end the iraq war, because thats the reason why the dems won the mid-term elections in 06' to begin with.
|
Admittedly, any of the Democratic candidates are better than the Republican ones, with the exception of Ron Paul, since he's really a Libertarian anyway. However, since the Democrats still cater to the Zionist lobby and other interests, we'd still be left with the same problems.
At mid-term elections, they failed to deliver on those expectations they were elected on, so what good are they?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MossadConspiracy
ron paul also wants to take money out of the pockets of Egyptians and take away birthright citizenship which is how alot of us and our relatives became Americans, and he also has a long history of making controversial statements about black people which seems to indicate that he might be racist.
|
I'd have to disagree with him on birthright citizenship. With the Egyptians, he's a non-interventionist, so what do you expect? However, Ron Paul isn't a racist, and those controversial statements he never actually made anyway. I'm not sure how an individualist Libertarian who
views racism as an ugly form of collectivism can possibly be a racist. Individualism is about as anti-racist as you can get.