Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaminyu
As far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul can win, and he's the best candidate there is right now for the reasons I mentioned, and therefore, I'm voting for him. I'm not playing this "lesser of two evils" game, when I can vote for a candidate that I actually agree with. You and I both know that Hillary and Obama are as committed to Israel and more wars as Bush is, and you also know how cozy they are with AIPAC. It's nothing but the same with them, so why should I vote for them?
|
ron paul cant win. lets be sensible here. he couldnt even make more than 10% of the vote in the iowa primary. thank god you live in a blue state, your vote will be meaningless regardless of how you vote.
all politicians cater to the zionist lobby. you cant get elected if you dont. thats a fact. if you want to change that, its time Muslims start actually voting for these people who have a chance to win, that way we can go back to them and say 'see you won because of us'. and i know that mosssad here will agree with me on that. unless we can stop the zionist lobby in its track, its useless to take it out on the politicians. they are very clever, they will split the muslim vote if they have to over nationality. its why bill clinton went to bat over kosova, then showed up on pakistani tv claiming how he helped the muslims of kosova so much. besides let's not forget all the billions of dollars in aid countries like egypt and jordan receive. along with pakistan now too.
if you really want to help Muslims, first find a way to get rid of the repugs. most democrats are opposed to the war, and any democrat who becomes president will have to end the iraq war, because thats the reason why the dems won the mid-term elections in 06' to begin with.