View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-15-2007, 02:54 AM
Aryan_'s Avatar
Aryan_
Senior Member Offline
 

Join Date: May 2004
Rating: 10 Votes / 2.90 Average
Posts: 5,024
Aryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond reputeAryan_ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The "Great" Pakistan under Secular Rule

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChotooMotoo View Post
Thank you for your very civil reply.

So you would have told the US to sit on it and spin eh? What do you think the consequence of that would have been?
Not exactly, but I wouldn't have done what Musharraf did either. Including handing over the Taliban ambassador to America - he could have been representing Hitler, but we were obliged by international law to protect him. Also, allowing the usage of Pakistani bases to bomb Afghanistan while we were completely kept in the dark on the campaign...something that continues to this day. That's not how you treat an "ally".
What do you think the consequence of that would have been?[/quote]

Doesn't really matter in my opinion. I'm inspired by something Martin Luther King said:

"Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic? Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But conscience asks the question - is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right"
__________________
All great truths begin as blasphemies
http://www.GreaterKashmir.com
Reply With Quote