View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2007, 09:47 PM
Variable's Avatar
Variable
Senior Member Offline
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Rating: 3 Votes / 3.67 Average
Posts: 8,311
Variable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond reputeVariable has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The big mess over Macleans' Islamophobic article

Quote:
Originally Posted by IbnMardhiyah View Post
They're asking for equal terms.

Your reply kinda goes to show what a bitter pill that is to swallow.
They're asking to take the reigns over major sections in an issue of their magazine. I don't know of any business that would hand over that level of control to anyone.

The press isn't obligated to offer equal terms to anybody. It sounds like this guy was a jerk, but neither do I think they're gonna make any ground by turning it into a human rights issue.

And I don't see how my reply did anything to demonstrate how it's a 'bitter pill'
__________________
What kind of peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war.... not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women -- not merely peace in our time, but peace in all time.

JFK
Reply With Quote