Quote:
Originally Posted by Khairan
For sure, all of the issues you are raising are completely valid. I'm by no means suggesting that the increase in STDs *couldn't* be a "real" finding; I am merely addressing the comment in your first post which seemed to suggest it there was little possible other explanation. I'm making a point of this because I think it is important to understand not only the patterns in disease reporting but also the cause of those patterns, as failing to do so can lead to erroneous or ineffective solutions.  |
Oh for sure. In some ways it is a positive sign to see the apparent rates increase, becuase that means that more cases are being reported. More cases reported means a better idea of disease prevalence, and more effective strategies to combat the problems can be developed.
I find it interesting that even with the threat of AIDS and other serious STD's there are still people out there either ignorant of the risk, or willing to take the risk. I would be most interested to see the diseasse rates (adjusted for under-reporting in unerserved areas) by geographical location, combined with the unmarried birth rates. I think comparing all those things would give a better idea of sexual practices in this country, and how well sex education in schools is doing to combat the problems.