Quote:
Chisti said
Thanks Abu Hind ... so there were some people who went nuts and had to be taken care of by the King ... what those nut cases did does not represent wahahbis since the King was a wahabi himself ... how is this causing drama??? there are nut cases in every group of people.
I am not tarnishing Shaykh Abdul Wahab ... why can we not have a civilized discussion? I never heard before that Abdul Wahab himself went on a killing spree etc until i read this post by this guy.
Hasn't Jaysh posted posts that were basically claiming that certain practices are haram or shirk? We discussed those by using texts and scholarly authorities. No one is stopping you from having a decent discussion.
This post is not even an issue of religion. It is about history. So no, I am not going to sunni forum. You just can't suppress ideas.
|
No one is suppressing ideas, you're already working within a certain paradigm where you've presupposed that ibn 'abdul-wahhab was bad- so even if we were to have a civilized discussion, you would still conclude that Wahhabis are bad.
