Quote:
Abu_Hind said
It seems like you're looking for another flame war.
The "wahhabi" tribesmen you refer to were known as "ikhwan". They were Bedouins who had responded to the "Wahhabi Call" and later went to extremes and used "Wahhabism" as a front to carry out their activities until the King was forced to take actions. Even Wahhabis readily admit that these ignorant Bedouins were wrong in many of their actions and went to extremes- but you seem to be using this as an excuse to further tarnish Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abdul-wahhab.
I mean if you're looking for some drama why not try "Sunni" forum, they'll egg you on and you can curse "Wahhabis" all you like?
|
Thanks Abu Hind ... so there were some people who went nuts and had to be taken care of by the King ... what those nut cases did does not represent wahahbis since the King was a wahabi himself ... how is this causing drama???
there are nut cases in every group of people.
I am not tarnishing Shaykh Abdul Wahab ... why can we not have a civilized discussion? I never heard before that Abdul Wahab himself went on a killing spree etc until i read this post by this guy.
Hasn't Jaysh posted posts that were basically claiming that certain practices are haram or shirk? We discussed those by using texts and scholarly authorities. No one is stopping you from having a decent discussion.
This post is not even an issue of religion. It is about history. So no, I am not going to sunni forum. You just can't suppress ideas.