View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2007, 12:40 PM
albano's Avatar
albano
Senior Member Offline
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Rating: Not Rated
Posts: 196
albano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond reputealbano has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Panel approves bill on Armenians

Quote:
Originally Posted by Variable View Post
Those weren't genocides, and they were carried out directly by the US Gov too. Genocide has a very certain definition, thus the debate over whether what happened to the Armenians can be considered genocide or not.

If sanctions against Iraq are to be considered genocide, then what the Turks did to the Armenians would certainly fit some sort of profile for it.
In Dresden and HIroshima didn't have to kill all the civilians.
History is written by strong people not by just people. So all the crap we read is worthless.
So let's see when the equilibrium changes what is considered genocide and what not?
Everything is relative.
Anyways I totally disagree with you.
__________________
‏المسلم من سلم المسلمون من لسانه ويده‏
Reply With Quote