View Single Post
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 11:47 AM
Hanbali's Avatar
Hanbali Offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,008
Hanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond reputeHanbali has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Why the Layman has no Madhab

Quote:
Originally Posted by riad19 View Post
bro, again, please show me an example of an opinion which is the "truth" and doesnt exist in any one of the 4 schools. if you cant, then your whole argument is just pointless blabbering.



so instead of following one of the 4 established schools which has the opinions of hundreds of scholars, one should just make taqleed of one scholar? the anti-madhab arguments are always ridiculous. why would you wanna follow one scholar where you can follow an entire school. in the schools of fiqh, each opinion is evaluated by many reliable scholars and either verified or rejected to establish a dominant opinion of the school. there is less chance of an error with following a madhab as opposed to following a "reliable scholar".
You obviously did not read the article at all. All your arguments have been dealt with.

Perhaps you so-called 'traditionalists' will listen to the advice of Imam an-Nawawi (ra) whom you always love to quote! Let us see what Imam an-Nawawi (ra) says:

“What is dictated by the evidence is that a person is not obliged to adhere to a Madhab; rather he should ask whoever he wishes.”

Your post indicates that you have not read the article AT ALL, since the article does not at all say that a person must follow only ONE scholar. Please read the article and then speak.
__________________
Defender of Tawheed
Reply With Quote