Quote:
Originally Posted by Salika
How is "rational" of the "rationlists" to oppose something that has no proven harmful affect and only citing only "challenging sensibilities and the basic concept of common well-being." Wouldn't reason dictate it's perfectly ok and safe?
Don't get me wrong I'm not advocating baby throwing but don't call yourself a rationalist?
|
Babies are resilient, but at the same time, I'm concerned about "shear injuries" to the brain and other "shaken baby" type damage. Those bounces are pretty dramatic...
