Quote:
Originally Posted by MossadConspiracy
Who are the experts that Al-Jazeera used to verify the accuracy of video tapes from Al-Qaeda before December, 2001?
What happened to them after December 2001?
There was no tape from Bin Laden in the days after 9/11
Anyway, yes you are being selective in the way I described. You are taking one weak piece of evidence from a source as truth and rejecting multiple varied strong pieces of evidence from the same source as untruth. Thats selectivity
|
You are just saying that they're strong, because they use video and/or audio to communicate, and were released by Al-Jazeera. However, that doesn't make them strong, since videos can be doctored. The audio is even more suspicious, since whether it's the real McCoy or not is questionable, and Al-Jazeera releasing it doesn't make it any more credible, since anyone could've given it to them.
Why would they need to use the more questionable audio-only, if they are able to use video? Also, why is it that the videos that were released in 2002, used the same recycled footage from previous videos? Why not just release a new, genuine video instead?
Also, the November 2001 confession video was
a total fake, and if they were faking videos then, who's to say they wouldn't be able to do so now?
Then we have As-Sahab, the brainchild of IntelCenter, with Adam Gadahn as its designated "front-man". They then release a whole flock of videos, but their source is ultimately what refutes their credibility as being genuinely from any real "Al-Qaida" (if such a network even exists). "Al-Qaida" itself appears to
not be all it's cracked up to be.
With bin Laden's death, it isn't just the news reports in December, 2001 that prove he died then. It's those in the context of everything else that happened beforehand, and his deafening silence afterwards, which proves it. And no amount of new audio and/or video footage is going to change that, regardless of who releases it.