Quote:
Originally Posted by IbnMardhiyah
The reason why it was summarily rejected, and the reason why I don't have to "bring" anything to the table because the official story as told by the USG is so extremely absurd that its inherently insulting for anyone between the ages of 20 - 60 to put it forward.
Furthermore, evidence showing the impossibility of the USG's official line on 9/11 is all over the internet and on Islamica as well. Why re-hash the issue?
Yes, if anyone on Islamica blindly repeats the USG's line on 9/11 ... I will laugh at them, mock them, insult them, I will be insulted myself, etc etc. Such people dont even deserve the brain that God gave them.
|
What’s the official line from Washington… that terrorists flew air craft into the WTC and the Pentagon? Cuz uh yeh…that’s pretty far out there.
It may be summarily rejected by you and Kaminyu. It sounds to me like you’re substituting any real argument with severe language and insults. I’ve seen Kaminyu’s websites, from ‘all over the internet’ which I suppose would satisfy someone who couldn’t possibly believe that it was anything other than a massive conspiracy by the evil Neo-cons and/or the Mossad. And any emerging evidence contrary to their solidified belief could only be doctored items which only serve to further ‘prove’ the depth of the conspiracy.
So from where I’m sitting, I see examples of terrorist attacks, beginning in the early 90’s and increasing, with corroborating statements by those responsible, including Osama bin Laden, from media both inside and outside the Western world.
And then on the other side, I see you: “no, it’s not true, idiots, dummies, stupid-heads… it’s not true… retards, dum-dum brains [etc. etc.]” - and nothing else.
I think I’ll take option A with a pinch of salt.